answered from live GitHub & Hugging Face data

Dify vs LangChain — which platform is better for building AI agent workflows?

langgenius/difyno license
MaintActive · today
Stars152k
Release1.16.115d ago
Contrib1.4k
Issues1.1k open
MaintActive · today
Stars144k
Releaselangchain-core==1.5.4yesterday
Contrib3.7k
Issues412 open

Verdict: Go with LangChain — it’s more established and offers greater flexibility in building AI agent workflows. Dify has momentum but presents risks in support and community engagement.

Comparison Overview

Feature Dify LangChain
Stars 152,241 144,093
Maintenance ✅ Actively maintained ✅ Actively maintained
Last Push 0 days ago 0 days ago
Contributors 1,421 3,708
Open Issues 1,071 412
License NOASSERTION MIT
Language TypeScript Python
Best For Modular AI workflows with team collaboration Dynamic agent engineering & component interoperability

Detailed Insights

Dify Details

LangChain Details

Conclusion

In evaluating Dify and LangChain, it's clear that LangChain not only has a more significant backing with a larger contributor base but also presents a more robust ecosystem for AI application development. While Dify is certainly promising for specific team-based workflows, the active community and maturity of LangChain make it the safer bet for building scalable and maintainable AI agent workflows.

github.com/langgenius/difygithub.com/langbot-app/LangBotgithub.com/svcvit/Awesome-Dify-Workflowgithub.com/xinnan-tech/xiaozhi-esp32-servergithub.com/evolution-foundation/evolution-apigithub.com/53AI/53AIHubgithub.com/cs-lazy-tools/ChatGPT-On-CSgithub.com/wwwzhouhui/dify-for-dslgithub.com/microsoft/markitdowngithub.com/langchain-ai/langchaingithub.com/bytedance/deer-flowgithub.com/headroomlabs-ai/headroomgithub.com/BerriAI/litellmgithub.com/FlowiseAI/Flowisegithub.com/danny-avila/LibreChatgithub.com/langchain-ai/langgraph
Answered live from GitHub & Hugging Face · openai/gpt-4o-mini · 8/12/2026

Ask your own open-source question →