Should I choose langgenius/dify or OpenHands/OpenHands for building agentic workflows?
Verdict: Choose OpenHands/OpenHands for a more flexible and comprehensive agentic workflow solution.
While both Dify and OpenHands show promise, OpenHands comes out as the more versatile option with its broad capabilities to integrate various AI models and automate workflows efficiently.
Project Comparison
| Project |
Stars |
Last Push |
Language |
License |
Open Issues |
Best For |
| langgenius/dify |
154,587 |
0 days ago |
TypeScript |
NOASSERTION |
1,053 |
Rich AI model support for workflows |
| OpenHands/OpenHands |
86,307 |
0 days ago |
TypeScript |
MIT |
663 |
Self-hosted control center for coding agents |
Key Differences:
Flexibility:
- OpenHands supports a variety of agent backends (like Claude Code, Codex, etc.) allowing for greater customization and integration within your infrastructure. It can run both locally and in the cloud, making it adaptable for different use cases.
- Dify, while offering a collaborative workspace for developing workflows, is primarily focused on its specific stack and models, limiting flexibility.
Community and Maintenance:
- Both projects are actively maintained, but Dify has a significantly higher number of open issues (1,053 vs. 663 for OpenHands). This could signal potential unresolved challenges that might affect users in the long run.
- OpenHands' active contributions and broader community engagement (544 contributors) suggest a sustainable development environment.
Licensing:
- OpenHands is under the MIT license, which is generally favorable for commercial use and integration, whereas Dify has an unclear licensing status (NOASSERTION), presenting potential risks for commercial applications.
Maintenance Signals
- Both projects are actively maintained, with their latest pushes occurring just recently (none older than a day). OpenHands' last release was on August 27, 2026, while Dify's was on August 25, 2026.
Recommendation
Choose OpenHands/OpenHands if you need a robust, flexible solution that allows for efficient automation and can switch between various models with ease. Choose Dify if you specifically require its unique features tailored for a less complex setup, but be cautious of its licensing uncertainties.